190
votes
Vote Now!
Which claim is least believable?
Carol Lam was fired for immigration problems.
Sampson had nothing to do with the bad review of Fitz's performance.
Karl Rove was uninvolved in these firings.
The primary modivation for these firings was the 4-year term.
Sampson was unaware of Republican calls/threats against Iglesias.
Rethugs accidentially stopped the hearings by objecting.
Sampson was not asked to resign.
US Attorney Charlton fired because of difference of opinion over recorded confessions and death penalty.
There is no evidence of wrongdoing.